The 5 best white-label website builders

Last updated: 4 September 2026
RankBuilderEditor styleFree plan availableStarting priceYour brandingEase of use /10Score
1YolaBest fitEasy to use, no coding requiredYes$9.95/moYes109.1
2DudaDrag and drop interface with client accessTrial only, 14 days$19.00/moYes, on top-tier plans58.7
3WebflowVisual canvas designed for designersYes, with subdomain$15.00/moDiscontinued in 202637.4
4FramerDesign canvas with built-in animationYes, with subdomain$10.00/moNot published47.0
5WordPress.comBlock editor plus pluginsYes, branded subdomain included$4.00/moThrough plugins56.6

If you're an agency, reseller, or enterprise shipping websites to clients under your own brand, Yola is the white label website builder to look at first. White label here means the whole stack is brandable: the website builder, the help center, human support, the online store, and the sites management dashboard. Your client works in what looks like your product and never meets the platform behind it. You configure the branding once at the account level, and the websites your clients are handed can be edited without code. Yola is built for companies selling websites as a service at volume, and it's sold on a custom contract.

Key takeaways

What is the best white label website builder for an agency?
  • Yola is the one to weigh if you sell websites under your own name and won't build a platform. Your brand goes on the editor, your client is handed a website they can edit without code.

  • Duda earns the shortlist if you want the terms written on a public page before you commit. Its white label page puts your logo, colors and domain on the builder, though only the White Label or Custom plan carries any of that.

  • Webflow still belongs here for the websites you deliver, but not for your name on the editor. That whitelabeling went with the legacy Editor in August 2026, and what remains is the closest design control on this page.

  • Framer deserves a look when your team already lives in design software. Animation and an AI design agent sit in the editor, though its agency page doesn't mention white label and a client website can't be exported later.

  • WordPress.com answers the exit question better than anything else here. You own your content and a client website can move to another company without a rebuild, while the branding itself has to come from a third-party plugin.

Your client opens an editor with your logo on it and a website they can change themselves without code, and that is what puts Yola ahead of the other four builders here.

  • Yola Sitebuilder

Overall score:
9.1/10

Pricing starts from:
$9.95 USD/mo (billed annually)

Free plan:
Yes

What setting up your Yola site actually looks like

Setting up a client website begins on a template instead of an empty canvas, and the AI-assisted setup produces a first cut of the pages once you answer a few questions about that client's business. So the first meeting opens with a real website on screen rather than a mockup of one. The rest of the job is putting their words and their photos in place of the drafted ones, and the contact form is customizable, so it collects whatever they need before quoting a job, with inquiries arriving in their inbox.

Then you hand it over, and that is where the white label part does its work. The editor your client logs into can carry your logo and colors instead of Yola's, and it's made for people with no technical background, so a handover is a short walkthrough rather than training. What we can't tell you from a yola.com page is what becomes of that website if the arrangement ends, because the arrangement isn't published anywhere, so put that answer in the contract you sign.

PROS:
  • Your own logo and colors on the editor, so your client sees your brand rather than the platform's.

  • Yola tells us the arrangement is open to any company, rather than gated to one tier on a pricing page.

  • The editor you hand over needs no code and has no learning curve, so a client can be let into it without training.

  • AI-assisted setup drafts a full first website, so a client sees something real early.

  • Hosting, an SSL certificate and automatic backups all sit inside the plan, so there's nothing extra to run behind each website.

CONS:
  • The white label arrangement isn't published, so the terms reach you in a conversation with Yola rather than on a page you can read and compare.

  • Client websites come out of ready-made blocks, so an element lands where its block allows rather than anywhere on the page, and there are fewer add-ons for a very specific client request.

What makes Yola a white label website builder

Two things decide it for a reseller, which are whose brand sits on the editor and how little the person you hand it to has to learn. The figure beside this block is Yola's own published plan, and Yola tells us the white label arrangement is priced separately on its own contract, so it isn't what a reseller pays.

  • Your logo and colors on the editor
    Yola tells us any company can put its own logo and colors on the editor and present it as their own.

  • Drag and drop editor
    Your client picks a widget up and drags it, and the layout doesn't break where it lands.

  • AI Website Builder
    Describe the client's business in a few answers and a whole first website gets drafted.

  • Ready-made blocks
    Galleries, services, pricing and contact blocks arrive already designed, so a client website isn't waiting on design work.

  • Automatic SSL certificate
    Every website you sell gets an SSL certificate without you arranging one.

Yola editor carrying a reseller's own logo and colors, first on this white label website builder list

Who benefits most

Yola works best for a reseller who wants their own brand on the editor and clients who can update their own website without calling.
  • You sell websites under your own name and won't be building a platform.

  • You want your logo and colors on the editor your clients log into.

  • You'd rather hand a client an editor than field every small text change.

  • You want a first draft of a client website in front of them quickly.

  • You're willing to settle terms in a conversation rather than read them on a page.

Create a professional, free website in minutes

The free website builder for small businesses, professionals, and online stores.
  • Duda website builder

Overall score:
8.7/10

Pricing starts from:
$19.00 USD/mo (billed annually)

Free plan:
Trial only, 14 days

Duda is made for the people who sell websites rather than the people who own them. Its own account of itself puts a team looking after other people's sites first, with shared editing, access for the client and your branding on the tool. Its white label page goes further than anyone else's here, saying the builder can carry your logo, your colors and your domain, so Duda's name never reaches the client. It is also the one offer on this page you can read in public before you talk to a salesperson.

Two things hold it back. That branding lives on the White Label or Custom plan, so the figure in the price column belongs to a cheaper plan carrying no brand of yours, and the only way in without paying is a 14-day trial. Duda describes itself as priced for professionals instead of a solo owner, and nothing we could read says what becomes of a client website once you move off it.

PROS:
  • Your logo, colors and domain on the builder, so the client doesn't see Duda.

  • The only white label offer here you can read on the vendor's own website before you ask.

  • Client access and shared editing, made for a team that maintains other people's sites.

  • Fast, reliable hosting with good performance behind what you sell.

CONS:
  • Your branding needs the White Label or Custom plan, not the one the price column is quoting.

  • No free plan here, just a 14-day trial to make the call in.

  • Its record says nothing about moving a finished website elsewhere, so that answer has to come from Duda.

Duda's best features as a white label website builder

Duda is judged here on what a client meets once the editor changes hands, and these are the parts that decide it.

  • Drag-and-drop editor
    Pages are put together by dragging, which is what the client meets under your brand.

  • Edit by device
    The layout can be adjusted per device instead of taking one automatic result.

  • Developer mode
    Code goes in when a client asks for something the editor doesn't cover.

  • Content import
    A client's existing content comes in rather than being retyped.

Duda builder under an agency's own brand and domain, second among these white label website builders

Who benefits most

Duda works best for an agency that wants the white label terms written on a public page and its own domain on the builder.
  • You want your own domain on the builder, not only your logo and colors.

  • You want to read the terms before you speak to a salesperson.

  • Looking after websites for other people is your main work.

  • You have a team editing the same client websites.

  • You can reach a decision inside a 14-day trial.

  • Webflow website builder

Overall score:
7.4/10

Pricing starts from:
$15.00 USD/mo (billed annually)

Free plan:
Yes, webflow.io subdomain

At heart Webflow serves designers and developers, which for a studio is the whole appeal. You work visually instead of writing code, the output is clean, W3C compliant HTML and CSS, and each screen size can be controlled on its own. Nothing here begins as a template, so a client website needn't end up looking like one.

On the brand question the answer is now a plain no. Webflow's help pages say editor whitelabeling belonged to the legacy Editor, and Webflow retired that Editor on 4 August 2026, so there is no supported way to put your name on the editor a client logs into. Its own record also says weeks rather than an afternoon, and calls it the hardest builder here for a beginner, which is your team's hours before a client sees anything.

PROS:
  • Complete design control worked visually, so a client website needn't start from a template.

  • Clean, W3C compliant HTML and CSS is what gets published.

  • An editor for clients and teams sits on its feature list, under Webflow's name.

  • Reusable and editable components, so a piece built once carries across a client's pages.

CONS:
  • Editor whitelabeling is gone: it belonged to the legacy Editor, which Webflow retired on 4 August 2026.

  • Weeks rather than an afternoon, and Webflow's own record calls it the hardest builder here for a beginner.

Webflow's best features as a white label website builder

The brand controls are gone, so what's left to weigh here is the website you deliver and the editor you can still let a client into.

  • Intuitive website editor for clients
    A client can be given editing access, under Webflow's name rather than yours.

  • Build CSS grid-powered layouts visually
    You build the grid on screen, and real CSS is what gets published.

  • Clean, W3C compliant HTML and CSS
    What a client inherits is markup that follows the standards.

  • Custom 301 redirects
    A client's old page addresses can be pointed at new ones during a rebuild.

Webflow visual canvas, whose editor whitelabeling was retired in August 2026

Who benefits most

Webflow works best for a studio that builds and maintains every client website itself and doesn't need its name on the editor.
  • You do the building, and the client is barely in the editor.

  • You need exact control at every screen size for client work.

  • You have designers on the team already.

  • Your brand on the editor isn't part of what you're selling.

  • Framer website builder

Overall score:
7.0/10

Pricing starts from:
$10.00 USD/mo (billed annually)

Free plan:
Yes, Framer subdomain

Framer arrives from the design-software side of the business. It's quick for anyone whose working day is already spent in design tools, the editor arrives with animation and reusable pieces inside it, and hosting and publishing are looked after, so a polished marketing site for a client can go up fast.

For a reseller two problems are on the record. Framer's own agency page doesn't mention white label, so there's nothing published that puts your name on the editor. And Framer says a finished site can't be exported and taken elsewhere, so a client leaving Framer is a rebuild rather than a move. Billing also runs on four separate meters, which are people editing, AI use, visitor traffic and content items, so what a client website costs you moves with how it gets used.

PROS:
  • Fast for a team already comfortable with design software.

  • Built-in animation and reusable pieces, with no second tool to bolt on.

  • Hosting and publishing are handled, and a free plan on Framer's own subdomain lets you try it.

CONS:
  • Framer's own agency page doesn't mention white label, so nothing published puts your name on the editor.

  • The site can't be exported and taken elsewhere, so a client leaving means rebuilding.

Framer's best features as a white label website builder

Framer has no brand controls to weigh, so these are the parts that decide what a client ends up with.

  • AI design agent
    A first draft of a client page gets made inside the editor.

  • CMS
    A client's content sits in a structure instead of being pasted into pages.

  • Localization
    A client website can run in more than one language.

  • Core Web Vitals
    Page performance is reported inside the tool you already work in.

Framer design canvas, with no white label offer published for agencies

Who benefits most

Framer works best for a studio whose team lives in design software and is content for the platform's name to stay on the editor.
  • Your team already works in design software every day.

  • You want animation without adding a second tool.

  • You're building the website rather than handing over an editor.

  • You can live with a client website that can't be exported later.

  • WordPress.com website builder

Overall score:
6.6/10

Pricing starts from:
$4.00 USD/mo (billed annually)

Free plan:
Yes, with a branded subdomain

WordPress.com is the hosted side of the web's most widely used platform, and it's the one builder here that answers the second half of this page in public. Its own record says you own your content and can move the website to another company later without rebuilding it, which is exactly what a client asks when a working relationship ends. More designs and add-ons sit behind it than behind anything else on this page.

The brand question goes the other way. White label comes from third-party plugins in its plugin directory rather than from the platform, so you need a plan that allows plugins and the branding then rests on a plugin you install and keep current. There's more upkeep in general, since designs, add-ons and updates are yours on every client website, and help means articles and forums instead of a person until you pay for a higher plan.

PROS:
  • You own your content, and a finished client website can be taken to another company without rebuilding it.

  • More designs and add-ons behind it than anything else on this page.

  • Staging sites, so a change gets tried on a copy before the client sees it.

CONS:
  • White label comes from third-party plugins rather than the platform, and it needs a plan that allows plugins.

  • Designs, add-ons and updates are yours to keep current on every client website.

WordPress.com's best features as a white label website builder

What counts here is where the branding actually comes from and what a client walks away with, and these are the parts that decide both.

  • 50,000+ plugins
    The white label route lives in this directory rather than in the platform itself.

  • Staging sites
    A client website gets changed on a copy first.

  • Jetpack backups and restores
    A bad edit on a client website can be rolled back.

  • Advanced design tools with CSS control
    The look can be pushed past the theme when a client asks for it.

WordPress.com block editor, where white label comes from third-party plugins

Who benefits most

WordPress.com works best for an agency whose clients must be able to take the finished website to another company later.
  • Your clients want to know they can leave with the website.

  • You want the biggest library of designs and add-ons behind client work.

  • You have the hours for designs, add-ons and updates.

  • You're happy for the branding to come from a plugin you install.

Final recommendation

Yola is the white label website builder to pick if you want your own brand on the editor without building a platform to put it on.

White label covers two separate questions on this page, which are whose brand the client sees and what the client keeps once the arrangement ends. Just two of the five website builders here can put your brand on the editor at all, which are Yola and Duda. Webflow retired editor whitelabeling with its legacy Editor on 4 August 2026, Framer's own agency page doesn't mention white label, and on WordPress.com the branding comes from a third-party plugin rather than the platform. With Yola the editor takes your logo and colors, Yola tells us any company can arrange it, and the client you hand it to needs no code to keep the website current. One reader should buy Duda instead: an agency that wants the white label terms on a public page, its own domain on the builder, and a plan it can sign up for today, and Yola publishes none of that.

When to choose Yola

Choose Yola if you want:

  • Your own logo and colors on the editor your clients use

  • An editor you can hand a client without training them

  • A first draft of a client website ready in minutes

  • Hosting, an SSL certificate and backups running behind every website you sell

Two things in this comparison need saying plainly, and the first is the price. The starting price on Yola's row, $9.95 USD/mo on the annual plan, or $119.40 paid upfront for twelve months, is Yola's own published plan. Yola tells us the white label arrangement runs on its own contract and its own pricing, so nothing on the Yola pricing page applies to it and that figure isn't what a reseller pays. We haven't put a number on the arrangement because we don't have one to give you. The second is that the two scored columns don't fall in rank order. Duda scores higher on getting your brand onto the editor, because its offer is written on its own website and covers your domain as well as your logo and colors, and WordPress.com scores highest on what the client keeps, because its own record says you own your content and can move the website to another company later without rebuilding it. For Yola, Duda and Webflow we found nothing published either way about moving a finished website elsewhere, so those cells say so instead of guessing.

When another builder might fit better

  • Duda, if you want the white label terms on a public page and your own domain on the builder.

  • Webflow, if you build and maintain every client website yourself and never hand the editor over.

  • Framer, if your team already works in design software and the platform's name on the editor doesn't bother you.

  • WordPress.com, if your clients have to be able to take the finished website to another company later.

What to look for in a website builder

White label reads like a single feature and it turns out to be several separate arrangements once you ask who owns what. The part that decides it is rarely on the pricing page.
  1. Which of your brand marks the editor carries. A logo and your colors is one thing, and the domain your client logs in at is another. Ask which of them the offer covers before you promise a client anything.

  2. Whether the terms are published or private. An offer written on a vendor page can be read, compared and quoted back. An arrangement agreed in a conversation can't, so you need it in the contract instead.

  3. Which plan the branding sits on. The branding is often on a higher plan than the price you see first, so work out what it costs per client website before you price your own offer.

  4. What happens to a live website when it ends. Some builders say in public that a finished website can move to another company, one says plainly that it can't, and several say nothing. That answer is what your client will ask you for.

  • Tip: Before you sign anything, put the same three questions in writing to each of these five website builders and keep the replies. Ask which of your brand marks appear on the editor, ask what happens to a live client website on the day the arrangement ends, and ask whose name the client's own contract is in. On Duda you can read the first answer on its white label page before you even ask. On Yola all three come out of a conversation, so save the email. If a reply skips the second question, ask it again before any client website goes live.

Our methodology

We compared five white label website builders on whose brand a client sees on the editor and what that client is left holding afterwards, reading each vendor's own white label page, its help pages and its published feature list, plus what Yola has told us about its own arrangement.

Feature counts didn't come into it. A long list tells you nothing about whose logo sits on the editor, or about what a client walks away with, and for anyone reselling websites those are the two questions on the table.

  • Brand on the editor. Which of a reseller's brand marks can the editor actually carry, and is the domain among them?

  • Where the terms live. Is the offer written on the vendor's own page, or does it come out of a conversation?

  • Plan gating. Does the branding need a higher plan than the one the price column quotes?

  • What the client is handed. Can the person you hand the editor to keep the website current without calling you?

  • Moving a finished website. Does the record say a client website can go elsewhere, say it can't, or say nothing at all?

  • Skill needed to run it. Does the tool expect a designer or a developer on staff before a client website can ship?

Every rating here comes from how a builder handles those tasks in real use, rather than from how long its feature list runs. Where a record said nothing, this page says nothing rather than filling the gap.

Frequently asked questions

Why is Yola first on this list?

Because this page turns on whose brand the client sees and what that client is handed, and Yola covers both without asking you to build a platform. Yola tells us the editor can carry your own logo and colors and be presented as your own, and that it's open to any company rather than tied to one plan tier. The editor itself is made for people with no technical background, so the client you hand it to doesn't need you on call. Duda scores higher on the branding itself, and it needs its White Label or Custom plan to do it.

Do I need developers to run a white label website builder?

No, not for the two builders here that can carry your brand. The Yola editor is made for people with no technical background and has no learning curve, so a client can be let into it after a short walkthrough, and Duda's is a drag and drop editor with a developer mode you can leave alone. Webflow is the one that assumes design knowledge, and its own record says weeks rather than an afternoon before anything ships. Framer points itself at design teams instead.

What happens to my clients' websites if the arrangement ends?

Get that answer in writing, because most of these five website builders don't give it in public. Framer says plainly that there's no export, so a client leaving it starts again instead of moving. WordPress.com says the reverse, that you own your content and can move the website to another company later without rebuilding it. For Yola, Duda and Webflow we found nothing published either way, which is why this page won't reassure you about it.

What can I not see before I sign with Yola?

The terms themselves. Yola tells us the white label arrangement is sold separately rather than on a published plan, on its own contract and its own pricing, and that account came from Yola on 28 August 2026 rather than from a page on yola.com. So the cost, the limits and the exit all come out of a conversation instead of a page you can compare. Duda is the opposite here, with its white label offer written on its own website.

Does white label mean my client never sees the platform's name?

That depends how far the branding goes. Duda's white label page says the logo, the colors and the domain can all be yours, so the client doesn't see Duda. Yola tells us the editor can take your own logo and colors and be presented as your own, and the account we have stops short of the domain. Ask which of your brand marks a builder covers before you put your name on it.

Can I put my brand on Webflow's editor?

Not any more. Webflow's help pages say editor whitelabeling belonged to the legacy Editor, and Webflow retired that Editor on 4 August 2026. If you've read an older comparison that lists Webflow as a white label option, that's where it came from. Webflow is still a serious tool for building the website itself, and the editor it gives clients and teams carries Webflow's name rather than yours.

Is the starting price in the table what a reseller pays?

No. The figure on Yola's row is Yola's own published plan, $9.95 USD/mo, which is billed annually and comes to $119.40 across twelve months. Yola tells us the white label arrangement runs on its own contract and its own pricing, so nothing on the Yola pricing page applies to it and we have no figure to quote you. On Duda the $19.00 USD/mo is the entry plan, and the branding needs its White Label or Custom plan instead.

Yola or Duda for a white label website builder?

Take Duda if you want the terms in public before you talk to anyone, and if your own domain on the builder matters as much as your logo. Its white label page sets that out, the branding lives on its White Label or Custom plan, and there's a 14-day trial in place of a free plan. Take Yola if you want an arrangement open to any company and an editor a client can work in with no code and no training. Duda genuinely wins on what you can read before signing, and Yola's terms come out of a conversation instead.